Show Notes
- — Captain Ingrid: the geologist who became a macro investor
- — The 2015 thesis: solar, batteries, and the end of oil
- — Betting against demographics: Japan, Europe, and the youth dividend
- — The deglobalization trade: reshoring, defense, and critical minerals
- — The 2020–2022 crucible: being right too early
- — The portfolio today: what she's holding and why
Host: Most traders think in days and weeks. Some think in months. Very few think in decades. Captain Ingrid is one of the few. A former geologist who spent 10 years in the oil industry before transitioning to macro investing, she built a portfolio around secular themes that most investors ignored until they became undeniable. Ingrid, welcome to the Mess Deck.
Ingrid: Thank you. I should say — I'm not a trader. I trade maybe six times a year. I'm an allocator. I find themes I believe will matter for 10–20 years, and I position for them. The hard part is sitting still.
Host: Your background is unusual. Geology to investing.
Ingrid: It gave me an edge most investors don't have. I understand the physics of energy. I know how hard it is to find copper. I know that renewable doesn't mean infinite. When I left oil in 2012, I saw the shale boom firsthand. I also saw its limits. Shale wells deplete 70% in the first year. You need to drill constantly just to stand still. That is not a sustainable energy system. Meanwhile, solar costs were dropping 20% per year. The writing was on the wall.
Host: Your first big bet was the energy transition.
Ingrid: In 2015, I put 25% of my portfolio into what I called the electron economy. Solar manufacturers, battery companies, grid infrastructure, electric vehicle suppliers. Not Tesla — too expensive, too narrative-driven. The picks-and-shovels plays. Enphase. SolarEdge. Lithium miners. Copper miners. I also bought uranium, because I knew nuclear would be part of the solution, even if the public hated it.
Host: How did that perform?
Ingrid: Terribly for the first four years. From 2015 to 2019, solar stocks went nowhere. Oil was cheap. Nobody cared about climate. My portfolio underperformed the S&P by 15% annually. I questioned myself constantly. But the thesis hadn't changed. Solar was still getting cheaper. Batteries were still improving. I held. And then 2020 happened. And then the IRA passed in 2022. By 2024, that 25% allocation had tripled.
Host: You also bet on demographic divergence.
Ingrid: Yes. In 2016, I read a UN population projection. Japan's population was shrinking. Europe's was flat. But Africa's was exploding. India's median age was 27. I realized the world was splitting in two: old, rich, shrinking economies and young, poor, growing economies. The investment implications were massive.
Host: What did you buy?
Ingrid: On the aging side: Japanese healthcare robotics, European pharmaceutical companies with geriatric pipelines, US senior housing REITs. On the youth side: Indian fintech, African mobile money, Southeast Asian e-commerce. Not individual stocks — too risky. ETFs and closed-end funds with local expertise. The WisdomTree India ETF. The AFK Africa ETF. The Global X Aging Population ETF. I didn't need to pick winners. I needed to be in the right geographies.
Host: The deglobalization trade.
Ingrid: That came later. 2018, when the trade war started. I had been a beneficiary of globalization — I worked for a multinational oil company. But I saw the political shift. Populism was rising everywhere. The consensus that free trade is always good was breaking. I started buying defense contractors, domestic manufacturing, and critical mineral companies in friendly jurisdictions. Not because I wanted the world to fragment. Because I believed it would.
Host: The hardest period was 2020–2022.
Ingrid: Brutal. COVID crashed everything in March 2020. My energy transition stocks got hammered — oil went negative, remember? Then 2021 was a tech bubble that made my value-oriented macro bets look stupid. Then 2022: inflation, rate hikes, war in Ukraine. My portfolio was down 30% at one point. I had friends calling me, asking if I was okay. I was fine. I had cash. I had conviction. And I had a 10-year horizon.
Host: What did you do in 2022?
Ingrid: I bought. Aggressively. Energy transition stocks were on sale. Uranium was on sale. Emerging markets were on sale. I deployed 40% of my cash between June and October 2022. I didn't catch the bottom. I didn't need to. I caught the area. By 2024, the portfolio had recovered and was at new highs.
Host: What's your portfolio look like today?
Ingrid: Energy transition: 30%. Demographic plays: 20%. Deglobalization / defense: 15%. Gold and commodities: 10%. Cash: 15%. Broad market index: 10%. No bonds — I think rates stay higher for longer. I'm not trying to time the market. I'm trying to own the future.
Host: What would you tell investors who want to think in decades?
Ingrid: Read. Not stock tips — history, demography, geology, geopolitics. The best investments are obvious in hindsight. The hard part is holding them when they're not working. I held solar stocks through four years of underperformance. Most people can't do that. They want quarterly validation. Secular themes don't give quarterly validation. They give decade-long rewards to the patient.
The best investments are obvious in hindsight. The hard part is holding them when they're not working. Secular themes don't give quarterly validation. They give decade-long rewards to the patient.
Related Guides
- Navigating by Star Charts — Long-term portfolio construction using macro trends
- The Helm Response — Rolling Beta: how far your portfolio moves when the index shifts
- Longitude & Latitude — Global macro navigation
- Convoy Tactics — Factor investing and smart beta
Fair winds.